Request for Official Office "lower" than Scapegoat

@no1 "virtually"

@no1 @unixrab Rats!

@Teripie

@The_Baron concur

@dashcloud If you think Emmanuel runs a good conference we need to get you out to Defcon or atleast a BSides.

@MrGlass I'd love to go out to Defcon, and have thought about it, but it's a heck of a lot easier to take a train to New York than fly to Vegas. I've thought the crowds are much different at the two conferences- how true is that?

@dashcloud Very different, true. Defcon is a big party. BSides is more professional security people but it has flavor. If your local to NY, you can try some of the near BSides events (BSides Charm http://www.securitybsides.com/w/page/80637041/BSidesCharm2015 is being run by good people). Or, since you like the POC||GTFO, you might like NOPE https://www.neighborcon.net/

@dashcloud

@Kidsandliz Well said.

@Kidsandliz u no u wahn it

@christinerenee never happen... " “I am the spirit that negates. And rightly so, for all that comes to be Deserves to perish wretchedly; 'Twere better nothing would begin. Thus everything that that your terms, sin, Destruction, evil represent— That is my proper element.” "

@unixrab you are a drama queen

@Kidsandliz i know - And you are insightful to pick up on that. Took years to come to terms with.

@Thumperchick Rightly so... (tho necessary)

@Thumperchick Nicely said, as always. And for the record, what I actually said is being blown out of proportion. Hmm, funny that.

@joelmw ahem: " * the satan (accuser, adversary--which I think sums him up nicely) " * Those were terms of endearment ...right? sweet talker. @thumperchick "shenanigans" is perfect!

@jsh139 how 'bout "maybe" ?

@christinerenee

@edlada Agreed. "I hate it here so much, I want to hang out all the time and get all of your attention"

The act is pretty lame, imo.

@dis_member I think you've nailed it.

@edlada @dis_member @joelmw - I'm beginning to think that you are all unable to read or if you can read, understand what you are reading. I've not trolled anyone... the unfortunate part of your Internet generation is that you think that disagreement and debate are TROLLING it is NOT. Disagreement is...well... when I disagree with your opinion on whatever you have an opinion on... Debate is when we then go back and forth providing merits for our position. If I zing you along the way for holding a stupid opinion or missssspellig something - not even that is trolling. Trolling is dropping into a thread, saying something wildly inflammatory and then sitting back and watching what all the thread participants respond with... with special joy in being able to inflame the most mentally challenged of them. I did NOT troll at woot - the biggest thing that happened there was the debate with @snapster about the screen resolution of woot.com and then the THIRD iteration (you probably stopped reading by now - a point made) of woot.com which foisted upon the masses the most horrid puke multiple shades of green with no contrast and largely missing Orange....and ... they fixed it. So grow up, wise up, learn your terms, stop whining and go sit in the corner and think about what you've done:

Why did you come to this thread? You SAW it was written by me... you did not come here to disagree or debate - you came to call names and degrade.. who are the trolls, indeed. Please.

@unixrab Now a messiah complex on how you fixed Woot? Someone who "disagrees" incessantly and embraces a title of 'devil' rarely has much of value to say. I never called you a troll, I said you craved attention. TBH I couldn't care less what you did on Woot. I was a quiet member there who mostly bought from Deals.Woot and the occasional Dyson, laptop or Leakfrog. What you do here is hang around to be irritable. The problem with your "generation" (as meaningless as when you use it) is that you think being contrary all the time is equal to being productive and helpful. You're the kind of person who argues endlessly and at the end claimed "Oh, I was just playing devil's advocate"


I might also add that navigating a forum and responding to posts that ask to for special attention is hardly "trolling"--it seems you have fallen into your own criticism--you cannot handle people disagreeing with how to interact with others.

@dis_member I would say 90% of the time - I post my lack of love for a particular product - or hate on @mediocrebot and the rest of you attack. I didn't fix woot - didn't say I fixed it. (Just curious: What were your reading comprehension scores ?) I said I didn't like it (as did a great many others) and THEY FIXED IT (stop here, go look at the third line above Elliot Ness) So..see? You gotta read more carefully bruh ;-) If you don't like my disagreement .. leave me alone. If you're looking for a kumbaya forum where we all hold hands and praise @snapster and @mediocrebot ... well..

PS: Devils don't play Devil's Advocate ...That's Keanu's job

@dis_member nah - I've yet to call you a name or insult you! heyyyyyyy maybe "trolling" is in the eye of the "betroller" !????

@unixrab Nice deflection, bro. Peace and love. PS-when you talk about your role in fixing woot-problems, that is called talking about how you fixed woot. Someday you'll learn how to process criticism without lashing out

@dis_member Well... if voicing my opinion with a host of others about a particular issue counts as actually fixing the issue Dude! Not only did I fix woot! I also brought back Magnum P.I. for the 8th season after I (ALONE) wrote to the network about the crappy 7th season finale (Limbo) ... I rule. Thanks @dis_member ! I feel totes better now!

@unixrab You are right, I have learned my lesson. You are not a troll. You are merely the most annoying, obnoxious, self centered forum poster I have ever experienced in my years on the internet. To call you a troll is an insult to legitimate trolls everywhere. At least trolls provide some entertainment value and a good troll is a thing of beauty. I have known trolls. I have had friends that were trolls. You kind sir are no troll merely a hemorrhoid on the ass of the internet. I would nominate you for the biggest hemorrhoid on the internet position but that too would feed your incessant need for attention. One could argue that I have responded to you twice here, also feeding that need, but I can say in good conscience that other than maybe saying something to you on Woot! years ago I have ignored you and will continue to do so forthwith. You sir are dead to me.

@edlada I understand and bear you no ill will - some relationships just aren't meant to be... it's not you; it's me.

@2many2no noted.

@goldenthorn Like OPS (+O) (operator status in IRC) back in the day? I asked for OPS but never got it. Dammit I still want it. Give me OPS, Meh!

@goldenthorn I was just running with what @joelmw said ... hyperbole you know.... you do know that @joelmw started the "satan" thing right?

@unixrab Damn it, man, don't start going serious on me now.

@goldenthorn

@ABitterWoman * * * Mode change "+o" on channel #Meh by jsh139

@abitterwoman @jsh139 I never got into the + and - with modes... I always have to use the numbers - even with setuid bit

@unixrab chmod 777? She was talking about IRC, not shell commands.

@jsh139 ahhhh... I see now. Thanks!

@jsh139 Hahaha! YES!!! Now I can kick/ban everyone and do a takeover! Evil laugh

@unixrab

@lisaviolet ahhhh... sweet nectar of the gods to start my Tuesday with.... Thank you

@Thumperchick Interesting! But, isn't douchiness in the hand of the besqueezer? By what standard would douchiness be measured ?

@unixrab a douche button next to the star on each comment.

@unixrab I think it would be up to the employees. Otherwise mob mentality kicks in. @JonT would be the most obvious to wield the power, but I'm willing to guess that he doesn't want the added responsibility of answering all of the calls to "douche out" a comment.

@Thumperchick Brilliant. I was thinking of something more extreme, but your idea is better.

@Thumperchick @Ignorant I guess I was assuming that it would be a function of one's individual account. Kinda like blocking someone on FB (only not as extreme). Not sure what it would take to implement, but it seems like it could be more automated that way. Each user would automatically have their designated douches blurred.

@joelmw that's going too far for me. Part of a community is seeing all views. Sometimes, someone you classify as a "douche" has something great to contribute. I think it should be on a comment by comment basis.

@joelmw Oh man, GOAT PERK! The monthly scapegoat gets to designate "douche outs" as part of their goaty responsibility. That would be ridiculously fun... for the goat.

@Thumperchick sounds agreeable. If I sounded douchey at any point, apologies. I blame it on not eating lunch today =P

@Thumperchick The age old question. Everyone wants no assholes, but which asshole decides which assholes are really assholes? I realize you are saying 'optional-click-to-see' but it's too slippery a slope, imo. Especially for one person to control (or even a mob, as you said earlier), and also very difficult to stay on top of anyway. I'd rather not have to click every blur, to see if I really wanted that one blurred. Could they also blur the curse words for those who don't like them? Nudity? "Gross" pics? Would look very different around here. Could/would/should some coding be done to implement some kind of 'PG version' buttons/filters? "I want a not-this-asshole button" "I want a not-that-asshole button." If there were an app for that on an individually customizable basis, ok. (A personal "TooAnnoying;DR.) But less than that would make this place less. End my soapbox-sounding opinion. I DO see the possible fun in it but in reality I think it might end up just sucking. TL;DR Nah, not for me.

@mehjohnson I am chuckling though. If the comment were blurred while the username was highlighted, funny to imagine scrolling through pages of blur unixrab blur unixrab. But I would still have to click 'unblur' most of the time.

@mehjohnson lol I'm with @mehjohnson ;-) What is this place? The Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mehnd ?

@mehjohnson I agree that the logistics make it unlikely. Who watches the watchmen? It is fun to think abouy, though. Besides, @shawn probably doesn't want to code more crap for the website that doesn't directly improve performance.

@Thumperchick Maybe someone can use the API to do something along those lines, idk, I have no fu there to know either way. But yes, it's fun to imagine some scenarios.

@mehjohnson "I am chuckling though. If the comment were blurred while the username was highlighted, funny to imagine scrolling through pages of blur unixrab blur unixrab. But I would still have to click 'unblur' most of the time." You read my mind. :-) It would be funny. And, yes, I would unblur at least some of them. :-)

@joelmw @mehjohnson @thumperchick

@Thumperchick

@Thumperchick Turning offending comments upside down gives me the giggles. Something like (of course it doesn't all fit on one line!)
$("a.p-nickname[href='/@unixrab']")
.parent().parent().css('transform','rotate(180deg)');

@brhfl ǝɹǝɥ oƃ ʇsnɾ plnoɔ noʎ ɹo
http://www.upsidedowntext.com/

@hallmike Thanks for not using the @ ! Now THAT was a truly annoying user. Sorry to dis your sis @lisaviolet.

@mehjohnson Douche him!!!!! NOW! (hmmm ... it's hard to get the phrasing right on that one)

@unixrab LOL, see, I think you (yes, even you) have funny shit sometimes. Don't douche it out!

@mehjohnson "don't douche it out.... if you can't take it!!! " ...DOH!

@mehjohnson Not my sister, I'm an only child. AFAIK, anyway.

@lisaviolet Haha, was just reminiscing about that epic thread, that led to your old former goatness.

@mehjohnson hmmm I did not know that "douche" was parentheses'd as (water torture)

..........(that may or may not be a douche-gif)

@unixrab Ya, I learned something too. From googling douche images.

@mehjohnson now I have to too.... curse you!