@f00l My vocabulary has now increased (Godwin’s Law), and I thought I’d already heard it all. @ACraigL This community is all over the map, but that is one direction I haven’t seen here. Is it possible that geeks and early adopters and such avoid ‘there’? Oh, and this is a fan:
/giphy fan
I only yield to - or fend off - the temptation to “go there” during satirical invocations of conspiracy possibilities. Possibly this is a character flaw and I should desist entirely. Not sure.
@dashbutt You may regret this before I’m done, but wth…
The Gmail tab was showing part of the label “Order/Tracking” (which I just renamed to “Order tracking” because I meant to do that eons ago and forgot).
When I order something from meh, a filter labels the email about the order with “meh.com/orders” and removes it from the Inbox. Another filter labels it with “Order tracking”. (It sucks that a single filter cannot apply multiple labels, but maybe one day GMail will grow up into a real mail client, tho it works fairly well as it stands.) The same filters kick in for the email from meh when an item is shipped.
When I get shit from meh, I remove the “Order tracking” label; the messages remain labeled with “meh.com/orders” so I can reference them later if desired.
Filters also label the daily emails from meh with “meh.com/daily email” (but not with “Order tracking”) and the @mention notifications get labeled with “meh.com” (none of these stay in the Inbox).
I do similar things with labels for orders from other places, though only a few are done automagically with filters (woot, amazon and maybe a couple of others). I also use the Order tracking label for things like Groupons and other coupons and credits from Amazon (e.g. I have five $5.99 Prime Pantry credits left from Prime Day that I need to use by end of September).
TL;DR: When I took that screen cap, I had fourteen outstanding orders/coupons: four from meh, one Amazon order and five Amazon Prime Pantry coupons, one Groupon coupon, two orders from woot and one order from ThatDailyDeal.
Meh. leans right, Microsoft left.
We all wake up the next day anyway. Some of us have even chosen to remain in our country of origin a little while longer.
@f001, I’ve never heard of Godwin’s law, but it sounds more like a theory to me.
@Yoda_Daenerys
In many widely public forums, and in the old days of Usenet, Godwin’s Law had a near mathematically certain application within any long political discussion.
The whiff of it sometimes creeps into modern political debate, but most candidates and partisans won’t go there on tape.
/image conspiracy
/image Third Reich
@f00l Not a fan.
@ACraigL
Apologies
Was just trying to win the “Godwin’s Law” contest.
Not any kind fan of Nazis or their associated conspiracies.
(Except when used as in “The Producers” and similar.)
@f00l Gotcha. No need to hurry it along. Also, I don’t think we’d get there in this community.
@ACraigL
I have seen something like Godwin’s Law applied here before (more than once?) in some threads, sometime…
If I remember, kinda in the same spirit as /giphy tho.
@f00l My vocabulary has now increased (Godwin’s Law), and I thought I’d already heard it all. @ACraigL This community is all over the map, but that is one direction I haven’t seen here. Is it possible that geeks and early adopters and such avoid ‘there’? Oh, and this is a fan:
/giphy fan
@OldCatLady
@ACraigL
I only yield to - or fend off - the temptation to “go there” during satirical invocations of conspiracy possibilities. Possibly this is a character flaw and I should desist entirely. Not sure.
@f00l …or in the movie Inglorious Bastards, that film makes me spit my chips on some of brad pitt’s lines about nazi’s
@Yoda_Daenerys
If you have not seen “The Producers”, both the Zero Mostel/Gene Wilder and the Nathan Lane/Matthew Broderick versions are incredible.
Mel Brooks has to be on my desert island.
@f00l no one wins with Godwin’s Law.
@Thumperchick
Except Mel Brooks. And possibly Quentin Tarantino.
@Thumperchick
that image was a no doubt ultra-lame attempt at conspiracy-related satire. /FAIL. I spoze, just take it down.
The bigger question is, why are you trying to filter searches? What are you hiding!?!?
@ELUNO The actual link is this: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa746475.aspx
Has to do with writing LDAP search filters. I was showing it to someone last week and still had the page open.
@baqui63 What did you order?
@dashbutt You may regret this before I’m done, but wth…
The Gmail tab was showing part of the label “Order/Tracking” (which I just renamed to “Order tracking” because I meant to do that eons ago and forgot).
When I order something from meh, a filter labels the email about the order with “meh.com/orders” and removes it from the Inbox. Another filter labels it with “Order tracking”. (It sucks that a single filter cannot apply multiple labels, but maybe one day GMail will grow up into a real mail client, tho it works fairly well as it stands.) The same filters kick in for the email from meh when an item is shipped.
When I get shit from meh, I remove the “Order tracking” label; the messages remain labeled with “meh.com/orders” so I can reference them later if desired.
Filters also label the daily emails from meh with “meh.com/daily email” (but not with “Order tracking”) and the @mention notifications get labeled with “meh.com” (none of these stay in the Inbox).
I do similar things with labels for orders from other places, though only a few are done automagically with filters (woot, amazon and maybe a couple of others). I also use the Order tracking label for things like Groupons and other coupons and credits from Amazon (e.g. I have five $5.99 Prime Pantry credits left from Prime Day that I need to use by end of September).
TL;DR: When I took that screen cap, I had fourteen outstanding orders/coupons: four from meh, one Amazon order and five Amazon Prime Pantry coupons, one Groupon coupon, two orders from woot and one order from ThatDailyDeal.
News headline from election day 2016:
Meh. leans right, Microsoft left.
We all wake up the next day anyway. Some of us have even chosen to remain in our country of origin a little while longer.
@f001, I’ve never heard of Godwin’s law, but it sounds more like a theory to me.
@Yoda_Daenerys
In many widely public forums, and in the old days of Usenet, Godwin’s Law had a near mathematically certain application within any long political discussion.
The whiff of it sometimes creeps into modern political debate, but most candidates and partisans won’t go there on tape.
Nah, it’s just a little drunk!
AND THEY RUN THIS WHOLE SHEBANG ON MICROSOFT CLOUD SERVERS!!!