Halloween's Least Wanted: Shoddy Goods 068
5
I’ll apologize in advance to anyone who loves the candy that I lay into in this Shoddy Goods, the newsletter from Meh about consumer culture. I’m Jason Toon and I don’t want to harsh anybody’s mellow. But seriously, peanut butter kiss lovers, you deserve so much better.
Every November of my childhood, after the Starbursts faded, the Kit Kats slunk away, and the Jolly Ranchers rode off into the sunset, one kind of candy was left. Blandly unappetizing in both its pale tan hue and even paler taste, somehow both rock-hard and tenaciously sticky, this stuff was like taffy drained of all color, flavor, and will to live. It’s the candy that a sadistic Victorian headmistress would serve the urchins in her care, more punishment than treat.
This resinous confection was packaged under various guises that all seemed more at home in a candy museum than a plastic jack o’lantern: Bit-O-Honey, Mary Janes, and most depressing of all, wrapped anonymously in either black or orange wax paper. In this case, the molasses blob has a little pocket of peanut butter inside, which only adds to the impression that they just scraped up everything that dripped on the floor of the candy factory and melted it down into a new candy. Of course, I still ate every single one, every year. Candy is candy.
Cyber-wags have been cracking wise about these gobs of heartbreak as long as there’s been an Internet. One meme says they “taste like a mixture of molasses and child abuse. Their manufacturer is so ashamed of them that nobody is even sure what they’re called.”
I didn’t myself until I started writing this story. Turns out they’re called peanut butter kisses. And I wanted to find out who inflicted them on us.

TRIGGER WARNING
Mary Jane was innocent
I thought my investigation was over as soon as it had begun when I immediately found this post on the Food Historian blog by Sarah Wassberg Johnson, a (you guessed it) food historian. She calls them “Mary Jane Peanut Butter Kisses” and describes them as a spin-off of the aforementioned candy by that name. “At some point,” she writes, “the small rectangular candies wrapped in an iconic yellow and red printed paper were succeeded by the ‘kisses’ - the rough rounds wrapped in black or orange waxed paper.”
With all due respect to Johnson, that story doesn’t quite add up. For one thing, the original Mary Janes never went away. For another, why would the Mary Janes manufacturer brand these candies but continue packaging the individual pieces in unmarked wrappers? Turns out, they wouldn’t. Mary Janes brand peanut butter kisses do have Mary Janes logos on each individual wrapper.
A 2006 review of Mary Janes Peanut Butter Kisses confirmed that these were but one variety of the oft-maligned sweetmeat.”I don’t know if I’ve ever had ‘name brand’ peanut butter kisses before,” the review says. “These are the first I’ve ever seen that have anything on the black & orange wax wrappers.” (Incidentally, the reviewer rated them 8 out of 10, with several supportive comments among the outraged ones, proving that somebody must like these things.)
Looked like this rap wasn’t going to stick to Mary Jane. To solve this one, I’d have to hit the streets - meaning, in my case, online archives.
See you in the funny papers

Don’t feed these to babies. Or grannies. Or anybody else. Pittsburgh, 1946
For those of us interested in the commercial history of the 20th century, newspaper advertising is our secret weapon. Newspaper ads reveal peanut butter kisses in myriad other guises. Mass-produced brands were the top layer of sediment, like this 1976 supermarket ad for Brach’s, and local brands like Chicago’s PSC in this 1960 ad. A little deeper, and I found ads for department-store candy counters touting their in-house PBKs, like Sears from 1948 and Rosenbaum’s from 1946.
“Everyone from Granny down to Baby has a sweet treat in store,” the latter ad copy said. “Chewy, tasty peanut butter kisses are palate-pleasers anytime.” Not a mention of Mary Jane in all this insanity. I think we can safely rule her out as a suspect. Just how deep did this thing go?
I pushed back through the decades, back to even before Mary Janes were created. I found countless ads like this one from 1909 for a Maine candy store. A photo from a Buffalo fair that same year, showing a tent offering “Wuest’s Peanut Butter Kisses.” A 1902 ad for a Washington DC department store promoting “PEANUT BUTTER KISSES, MADE FROM PRIME MOLASSES AND PEANUT BUTTER.”
So contrary to the Food Historian blog post (which, of course, Google AI is now repeating as the truth), peanut butter kisses predate Mary Janes entirely. I was starting to think nobody was to blame for this crime. Or maybe… we all were.
Kiss machine
Other sources pointed to the ubiquity of peanut butter kisses as a standard, widespread, generic offering of early 20th-century candy stores. The novel The Jaybird by MacKinlay Cantor, published in 1932 but set around 1916, has small-town kids drooling over a dime-store display of peanut butter kisses “pouring out of a wooden barrel.”
Recipes for peanut butter kisses appear in numerous pre-WWII cookbooks and home magazines, like the one in a 1930 candy cookbook for home use, Candy Recipes by R.R. Stewart, where the peanut butter is partially mixed into the molasses but left “in streaks through the candy.”

Looking for a kiss, Washington DC, 1902
A 1912 manual aimed at professional confectioners, The Twentieth Century Candy Teacher by Charles Apell, settles it once and for all. With ingredients including 20 pounds of glucose, 15 pounds of sugar, and 5 pounds of condensed milk, its recipe for peanut butter kisses is just the right size for the candy store who probably made most of their own candies on the premises.
Did you know “kisses” were a generic candy type long before Hershey’s Kisses came along? I didn’t, but many of these recipes sit alongside others for the likes of black walnut kisses and caramel coconut kisses. Apell’s unexplained reference to a “kiss machine” got me curious, leading to this footage of a vintage kiss machine in action, more widely (but less sexily) known now as a taffy wrapping machine.
Anyway, just as nobody owns the concept of taffy, nobody owned kisses, peanut butter ones included. A 1923 trademark filing by the Kibbe Brothers Company registered their distinctive wrapper for peanut butter kisses, not the candy itself.

To think, this box could’ve been holding something more wholesome, like cigars
Grassroots? More like grossroots
So there it is. Peanut butter kisses are nobody’s fault. They’re a vernacular candy. A grassroots phenomenon. A treat that spread organically, not because of the brute marketing muscle of some big multinational conglomerate. It was originally a locally produced, hand-made product with a short list of easily pronounceable ingredients.
What’s more, the flavor and color that kids like me found bland was characteristic of a time when American food was less artificially jazzed with dyes and chemical flavorings. Our great-grandparents liked peanut butter kisses because their taste buds hadn’t been blown out by easy access to hyper-sweetened junk food.
All of which makes me feel a little bad for hating peanut butter kisses so much. But not enough to eat them.

Line drawings don’t do them justice. Chicago 1960 and Manhattan, Kansas 1976
Everyone knew that one house that gave out full-sized candy bars, but there was also that weird house that gave out random loose change. As a kid I always loved the mini-boxes of Nerds since they’d last longer, so I could draw out the time I was rotting my teeth before having to go back to ‘real’ food. Let’s hear what your favorites and most hated treats were in this week’s Shoddy Goods chat.
—Dave (and the rest of Meh)
Cleanse your palate with these sweet Shoddy Goods stories:
- Meet the guy who first put impulse buys at the checkout
- The birth of the cereal box as we know it
- When I tried the first e-cigs in 2008
What were your favorite and least favorite Halloween treats growing up? Of course everyone knew that one house that gave out full-sized candy bars, but there was also that weird house that gave out random loose change.
As a kid I always loved the mini-boxes of Nerds since they’d last longer, so I could draw out the time I was rotting my teeth before having to go back to ‘real’ food.
- 17 comments, 18 replies
- Comment
I like gummy/chewy stuff like sugar baby’s, dots, the chewy lemon heads in different flavors that you only find at weird gas stations, nerds. I’m not a huge fan of chocolate, but I do like some Reesie’s and Twix.
those weirdly crappy ‘peanut butter’ candies in the black and orange wax wrappers!
@chienfou the only place I found those this year are Dollar Tree.
@ironcheftoni
I hadn’t noticed them there. I DID, however, buy some mellocreme pumpkins!
Not a fan of black licorice. If I got Good & Plenty I just ate the sugar coating.
@heartny I actually liked Good and Plenty at some point in time and then I didn’t and then I did one of those things. And I have had real Dutch licorice. Never again that was nasty
@heartny I have a box in my pantry at this very moment. I love them
Not a fan of the Bit-O-Honey or any sticky candy. Oh, I’d still eat it mind you. I liked root beer barrels tho.
I didn’t like the powdery stuff, like Smartees or Necco wafers; really don’t like black licorice! I preferred candy bars, but not Butterfingers. Mounds, Almond Joy & Payday were good scores.
Sugar Babies for the win. Sugar Daddies were too difficult to eat. I’m also a fan of All Things Black Licorice, so Good N Plenty were up there. There is a licorice company that used to have peppermint coated black licorice, which I loved, but they discontinued it. Chocolate, of course, especially with nuts and/or caramel.
Not a fan of gum, particularly that weird-tasting pink stuff.
my grandma gave out full size candy bars. Which is why this meme makes me smile and think of her. She did live until she was 98. Maybe that was why.

@ironcheftoni I love that!
@ironcheftoni Yep Chocolate can do wonders!
I liked them all, with few exceptions. Mary Janes and Sugar Daddys were indeed hard to eat, for I was always a chewer not a sucker nor a licker.
Besides growing up in an era without fluoridated water or toothpaste, indeed we didn’t always have running water or an indoor toilet for that matter, tooth health suffered. Cavities abounded, and sticky candy was the bane of anyone who had a mouthful of metal amalgam fillings.
Sugar Babies were a softer form of caramel and could be chewed with only minimal filling removal risk.
I loved licorice then and now. With the exception of the Dutch black licorice that contains ammonium chloride that Europeans are so fond of. No. I preferred the sweet kind as in the black jelly beans, Good ‘n’ Plenty, black licorice twists, and Blackjack chewing gum if that was all that was available.
I liked Mary Jane’s and Bit 'o Honey as well owing to the peanut butter nuanced flavorings. And I didn’t get them very often but peanut butter twists were alright by moi.
I even liked the annual appearance of candy corn. BTW, when I first started to read Jason Toon’s latest, I thought that he was going to opine on the horrors of candy corn as so many, many others do.
Of all the candies of my youth, I did have some standout favorites. I liked Zero bars,
Zagnuts, Baby Ruths, Butterfingers, Almond Joys, and to a lesser extent Mounds, M&Ms (decades before there were peanut covered M&Ms), Raisinettes, Malted Milk Balls, Hershey Bars (preferably with almonds)…Hell’s Bells, there was hardly a candy that I didn’t like. With the possible exception of two-- vanilla creme filled chocolate drops and horehound candy canes.
Mother would lay in a supply of chocolate drops along with some spiced hard candy just before Christmas each year. The spiced hard candy (cloves and cinnamon) I liked.
Those awful chocolate drops were to be avoided until late in January or maybe even February of the next year, when, when, when, there was nothing left in the house but a few of those wizened, hardened, semi-crystalized chocolate drops.
To discover one of those on a cold, miserable, rainy day in mid-winter was about the best thing ever!
The horehound candy canes were a real shock to my tastes, which in those days of my youth, I’m sure were far more acute than now.
But like the chocolate drops, given long enough in the candy dessert period between Christmas and Easter, why one could develop a taste for them as well.
Who knew?
@Jackinga Here is a better picture of the chocolate drop from the days of yore.
@Jackinga

While we were in Italy several years ago I ran across Pocket Coffees.
OMG they were amazing. Basically a shot of (liquid) espresso enrobed in chocolate. You popped in your mouth and the liquid gave you that burst of coffee flavor followed by the chocolate. I bought a metric shit-ton to bring back to the States and share with friends.
Several ended up staying in my cabinet long enough that the centers crystallized and they were like little shrunken skulls. Totally different experience as you say. Of course, I still ate them!
@chienfou I can relate! I discovered a similar coffee candy, Kopiko, about 10 years ago give or take. They are available in two flavors: regular and cappuccino. At the time, they were hard to find. Now I see them more often and places like Walmart and Target have been known to stock them on their shelves.
When I see a big bottle, I usually buy it when my supply runs low.
But like a lot of such things, I will eat them on occasion and then not so much for a while. But after a long spell, what a joy to find a couple in a jacket pocket at an odd moment.
Back in the day when one of the grands used to play school sports, we often found ourselves seated with other supporters. I usually had a pocket supply of Kopiko and one lady in particular would see me coming and would inquire expectantly if I had any of “those” delicious candies. I used to laugh at that, and hand over a few.
Black licorice in any form, Good n plenty hit the trash can. I’m trying to remember what else I didn’t like. I definitely didn’t hate the peanut butter kisses as bad as Jason did. I’d eat them but they were usually later in the bag.
Omg I feel so seen. Every single year the candy left over was the Mary Janes. They are so gross. We also had houses that gave out random loose change, and one older lady who gave out homemade popcorn balls. Simpler times indeed.
Those peanut butter kisses taste burnt to me. Not chocolatey, not peanut buttery. Just burnt.
best: Atomic Fireball.
worst: candy cigarette.
/Showme a large bag of full size chocolate bars
/showme a large bag of full size chocolate bars
@mediocrebot @jouest Hmm, the bot had no problem with the brand names for these, and they weren’t even in the prompt!
@jouest @Kyeh Although M&Ms aren’t a chocolate bar (and their bags aren’t usually quite that shape), so don’t give it too much credit…
@jouest @xobzoo The thing is, the bot’s been refusing to do images with licensed characters like Big Bird or Wonder Woman, but apparently candy brands are okay.
Loved getting Candy Apples and plain ones from the ritzy areas in town along with the toothbrush from the local dentist but the waxy fangs, lips, and harmonica were awesome too! And any chocolate!
Anything that we didn’t like just got traded or put into the candy dish! I was short in school, so I was able to trick or treat past my prime! When it was finally my time to give out candy, I always made little treat bags for the kids!
FOOLS! TOOLS! JEWELS! AWESOME!
Hah! Nailed it!

/giphy happy dance
@chienfou Cute happy dance, but your link doesn’t open for me.
Also none of Jason Toon’s newspaper archive links are viewable without a subscription, @dave.
@dave @Kyeh
That’s weird! It should send you to the comment I made at the start of this page… Monday @5:17
@chienfou @dave
That’s what I thought it was but it just wouldn’t go there.
@dave @Kyeh

/image verrry interesting
The video of the “kiss machine” led me to this wonderful campy thing which is still appropriate since it’s Halloween weekend, right?!