Feature Request: Anti-Necropost, Anti-Spam (TL;DR Warning)

djslack went on a bit of a rant said
12

Our friends the link spammers love to raise long-dead threads to shitpost links to their awful websites. I’ve been thinking of potential ways to defeat this for a little while. I know this community exists with a very light moderation hand and doesn’t want to censor any user activities, but I feel bad repeatedly tagging thumperchick for the same lameass bs multiple times a week and would like to try to make the system smarter to ease that load.

I know that Mehdown is open source but as I understand it that’s more the presentation layer for posts here, and I think my ideas might be better implemented in the forum itself. If that’s available to check out like Mehdown I’d be happy to take a stab at doing it myself.

Anyway, here are my ideas. Feel free to discuss their merits or shortcomings and add your own:

Anti-necropost:

  • Prevent new posters (<10 posts?) from replying to posts older than x days (90?) or commenting in a thread that has been dormant for the same x days
  • Ask seasoned posters (anyone with more posts than the new posters above) “This thread has been dead for x days, are you sure you want to revive it?” when they initiate a comment or reply on a long-dead thread.
  • Potentially change the topic image to a skull or the like if a long-dead thread has been necroposted on to warn other users (I’m not 100% sold on this one)
  • Potentially auto-lock threads that have been dormant for x days (again, not sold)

Anti-spam:

  • Filter out links posted by users with the same newbie level, either by invisibly removing them or by actively refusing to accept posts with URL content
  • Add a tattle button to posts
  • Add a neg-star/downvote option, with a function to hide posts with poor rating
  • Somehow hide suspect links from search engine crawlers to eliminate the benefit of link spam (this is a very nebulous idea right now, not even sure this is possible)

I’m proud of the open community we have going on here. I want to be very careful about not crossing the line between killing spam and shutting down unpopular content. But I think there are several bad actors who realize that this forum is very actively indexed by Google and I believe it has a high reputation in Google’s system. Combine this with the low barrier to entry (a Good Thing in my book, except in the spammers’ case) and you get people trying to take advantage of the system. It’s not out of hand yet, but it’s not slowing down, and I think taking measures now rather than once it gets out of hand can help keep the content quality in this community as high as it traditionally has been.

Or maybe it just bothers me more than it should.