April 3rd - April Goat v2.0 "A Goatly Reboot" and "What Is This Madness?"

6

April Goat v2.0 “A Goatly Reboot

The April Goat has been more like a goast than a goat. That darned @ruouttaurmind got goated, then went MIA!

Goast or Goat

Most humble apologies to all. A family emergency came up on Thursday morning, and I had to make an unexpected trip out of town on Thursday afternoon. After all the chest pounding and crowing I did on Friday proclaiming April “the month of Galactic Goat-Sheep”, I submitted a phoned-in performance for the first couple of days. I’m back home now, and moving forward.

So I’ve uploaded the Goat v2.0 update, and I’m pressing CTRL-ALT-DEL and doing a Galactic Goat-Sheep reboot. Barring unwelcome family developments, I should be a present goat for the remainder of my servitude. Thank you all for your patience as I find my goat footing. Let’s all see where this goes!

“What Is This Madness?”

While I was out of town, my roommate signed for a piece of registered mail. Unless it’s a check from Publisher’s Clearinghouse, registered mail seldom contains good news, innit.

With much trepidation, I unsealed the envelope, and was greeted by a summons to appear at a hearing in Justice Court. But for what?

First a brief background. Back in October I whined on ad nauseam in the forum after being the victim of a home burglary. Many, many items were stolen, much damage done, no insurance coverage for the loss (another story for another day).

In February, I was contacted by a police detective. Apparently one of my stolen items turned up in a local pawn shop. Of course I was excited! Sure, it was only a single item, but the wheels of justice were churning, and better to get back something rather than nothing.

“Where do I have to go to claim the item?” I asked. “Hold the phone” the detective said. It turns out, in my state, once a stolen item is identified at a pawn shop, the law makes provision for the pawn shop to demand an ownership hearing.

In other words, the pawn shop has the right to make a claim on the stolen property because they gave value to come into possession of it. Yes, my state has given pawn shops the potential to keep my stolen property, and leave me with a NOTHING! WHAT IS THIS MADNESS?!?!?

Crazy!

Apparently I have to go to a hearing and prove why the court should grant me possession of the stolen property, leaving the pawn shop to suffer loss of the value they paid to obtain the stolen property.

It seems the “pawn shop lobby” successfully rallied state legislators to buy into the concept that pawn shops provide a community service, and are unable to shoulder the financial burden of monetary loss suffered when they are required to return stolen property. I guess the legislators agreed, and enacted this asinine law protecting the pawn shop interests ahead of the theft victims!

“Pawn shops provide a community service. We provide emergency funding for families in need. Without the service of a pawn shop, financially burdened families might have their utilities disconnected, their car repossessed, or worse… their children may go hungry. The service we provide puts much needed cash in the hands of those looking to avoid state and federal assistance programs, and support themselves.” Or at least that’s how it was explained to me by a representative of a local pawnbrokers association.

My assertion: It’s a cost of doing business. If you don’t like the cost, find a different line of business. If necessary, protect your interests by holding pawned merch in escrow until the stolen items database search is complete, then release funds after 30 days or whatever. “No consumer in need can wait 30 days for funding” was the response. “We would lose all our business with that model” he said.

So in a couple of weeks I’ll be heading off to court to prove an item that I purchased, which belonged to me and was taken from my home in a burglary should be returned to me.

I’m curious to hear your perspective on this. Particularly anyone with experience in the pawnbroker trade. But please, everyone else opine about the strengths and detriments of this odd law.