Ever notice than in an internet search query, you can totally mangle your request with typos, but it still tends to find what you wanted? Unless you have miss-typed the FIRST letter of the query.
First line is as typed. (Eight binary triplets, counting from 0 to 7.)
Second line is same following /jumble.
Conclusion: It will scramble binary literals also.
(It did preserve the initial zero and the last seven – how’d it know?)
(Not sure what that is good for, but probably something.)
There is a difference between being artificially terse via disemvowelment and/or substitution with minimal phoneticization, and uncorrected obvious mangling. I may side-eye the former once in a while, but it doesn’t usually rankle. OTOH, I generally will not waste my time on the latter. Autocorrecting the the odd obvious typo is the price of modern communication. (Asking DYRM_x? is the key to deciphering typoes that could have gone multiple ways.) But intentionally taking perfectly good words and shredding them just to be cute or faux-clever? FOAD, MF.
I guess we are pretty smart, for dumb humans.
Sorry, that fell under “Too Broken, Won’t Read”.
@werehatrack You must be trying too hard.
Ever notice than in an internet search query, you can totally mangle your request with typos, but it still tends to find what you wanted? Unless you have miss-typed the FIRST letter of the query.
https://duckduckgo.com/q=bteatles+wihte+balum&ia=web
That’s artificial brains at work.
Did you know we have a Mehdown slash command for this? Try out Jumble.
@ExtraMedium
I gsues I hvae to tpye sohmeitgng hree, rihg?t?
@ExtraMedium
000001010011100101110111
0001100000011100111011111
First line is as typed. (Eight binary triplets, counting from 0 to 7.)
Second line is same following /jumble.
Conclusion: It will scramble binary literals also.
(It did preserve the initial zero and the last seven – how’d it know?)
(Not sure what that is good for, but probably something.)
@ExtraMedium Huh? Just noticed 2nd line had extra 1; wonder where that came from?
Not only that, but also filling in missing letters. One of my coffee mugs:
Also:
/image lolcat speak
Also also:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOLCODE
There is a difference between being artificially terse via disemvowelment and/or substitution with minimal phoneticization, and uncorrected obvious mangling. I may side-eye the former once in a while, but it doesn’t usually rankle. OTOH, I generally will not waste my time on the latter. Autocorrecting the the odd obvious typo is the price of modern communication. (Asking DYRM_x? is the key to deciphering typoes that could have gone multiple ways.) But intentionally taking perfectly good words and shredding them just to be cute or faux-clever? FOAD, MF.
So why can I break words so badly that spellcheck just plain gives up?