Amazon Haul.. what does that imply?
5While checking my Amazon account today an announcment came up having to do with Amazon Haul. This seems to be designed to compete with Temu et al. As you can see from the screenshot this lists YOU as the importer (I haven’t used Temu so I’m not sure how they classify you).
Under the “learn more” link it says you are responsible for the fees, customs etc. Does this mean you’ll get stuck with a bill for any tariffs (which are generally paid by the importer)? Will you come back and get re-billed (at a different price) in order to cover that fee? How would you know what it’s going to be before you place your order? Will it be paid through your Amazon account or directly to a billing from the US government?
So many questions!
- 6 comments, 21 replies
- Comment
Looking into it (I don’t use the app so had never heard of it, Amazon will do one of two things - you pay all on some products, or you pay a flat fee in advance on some products and get refunded the difference if you pay too much (couldn’t find if you pay more if you underpay their flat fee in advance).
This is how I interpret it:
“We are unable to predict what the tariff will be on imports from one day to the next, so we don’t know what any item/s will actually cost you. We are “allowing” you to act as the importer so that we can state a price (which we will collect and from which we will take our fee) and let you deal with the tariff when the item arrives at your post office. You will have to pay the tariff ( be it 10% or 150%) to claim the shipment.”
This was how things worked in the past when there were restrictions and tariffs on imports. The seller/sender had to fill out a declaration of content/value that was placed on the shipping box next to the address. The Postmaster had to collect the tax by check/credit card based on the value stated on the box. I remember doing this in the '70s and '80s. I also remember senders getting a bit “creative” describing the contents/value of the package.
But - who knows? I’m unsure what “facilitate customs clearance” means for this stuff.
@rockblossom
My guess is that it means that Amazon will do as little as possible for you to still follow customs regulations and as much as possible to avoid paying any customs fees or taxes. In other words, “Here are some forms we filled out because we had to. If you have any questions, call somebody else. Buh bye!”
@ItalianScallion I noticed that Amazon will accept returns on eligible items and will refund the selling price when received. Whatever you paid the gov’ment in added taxes/tariffs is your problem. And since any tariff has already been paid, Amazon is free to resell the item for whatever it can get for it.
@rockblossom Now that’s sneaky.
@ItalianScallion Did a bit of research. Amazon may be taking advantage of:
Source: https://www.china-briefing.com/news/us-trump-tariffs-key-implications-for-chinas-ultra-fast-fashion/
So maybe there will be no tariff for stuff shipped directly to the “importer” of these, and if any are returned to Amazon, they have neatly evaded the extra tax by not importing in bulk. Or the “de minimus” charge will be in effect, and the buyer will still have to pay. Who knows what will be in place on Monday.
@ItalianScallion @rockblossom The De Minimus exemption for parcels with a value under $800 is explicitly eliminated in the up-again-down-again-maybe-104% fiat tariffs, so even something that’s $3 gets nicked for the tariff, and possibly for a customs broker fee (typically not less than $25) and maybe a bonded warehouse handling fee (could literally be anything) and a COD fee (possibly another $25-$50) on top of all of that. USPS has stated that for small-value parcels, the on-top-of-tariff fee will be $25 inclusive.
Bottom line: Until it becomes clear that the administration has decided to concentrate on fucking up something else, and restores the old (saner) policies, juststay away from Temu and Shein and Wish and Haul for anything that’s ship-direct from China.
@ItalianScallion @rockblossom
https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/04/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-closes-de-minimis-exemptions-to-combat-chinas-role-in-americas-synthetic-opioid-crisis/
@rockblossom @werehatrack I’m guessing that all along I’ve been considered the importer when I buy something that ships from another country directly to me and that the de minimus exception is what has made it so that I don’t have to file any paperwork and pay import duties. In December I was surprised to find that two gifts I ordered were shipped to me from China. Now I’ll have to pay more attention and/or ask the seller about shipping. I guess I’ll find out about all this soon since I ordered an antique military-issue type of coffee maker and it’s shipping to me from Ireland, which I didn’t realize when I ordered it.
@rockblossom the post office, UPS, FedEx, etc will do manifest clearance for their plane as it arrives into the US. They are currently allowed to do this. Clearance will be based upon the declared value the sender listed in the commercial documents included with the shipment.
The issue w the manifest clearance is that it is riddled w errors and is why most large companies do not allow the carriers to clear their goods. W Fed Ex, for instance, you can select BSO (broker select option), where Fed Ex does a document handover (for a fee) and holds your freight in a bonded area until your broker provides released 7501/3461 documentation. At that point the shipment is removed from thr bonded hold and delivered. UPS has something similar, I just dont recall what its called.
With the removal of the de minimus exemption a clearance will still be done as in thr past, but you will likely be subject to duty (unless your item is duty free or has chapter 98 exemptions), and of course there will be tax charges. I THINK the minimum is something like $25 now, but its been a long while since I’ve handled or oversaw brokerage at a company.
And apparently there is mass confusion in the brokerage world given all the changes happening at lightning speed. Charges should be incurred based upon the rule in effect the day the shipment departed origin, so wheels up for air freight or departure from the port for ocean.
@rockblossom @werehatrack I spoke too soon. After having read the reference werehatrack posted linking to the White House’s statement on the de minimis exemption changes, I now realize it applies only to China and Hong Kong. At least I know now that things under $800 that are shipped from Europe directly to me are still exempt.
@rockblossom @tinamarie1974 USPS had an advisory posted last week stating that the de minimus would be entirely gone as of May 2nd, and the minimum combined duty and COD fee would be $25. On April 8th, the administration tripled down on that and bumped it to $75. (YEOWCH!) What’s not explicitly stated in the (sloppily written, IMO) order is whether the $75 is a minimum, or whether the remitter has the option of paying at the ad valorem rate (90%) for items whose value is below the point at which it would be $75 if paid ad valorem ($83.34). My reading of the April 8 EO seems to indicate that the $75 may be the de minimus flat rate, with the duty assessed ad valorem for $83.35 and above. I think that $75 is almost certainly the minimum rate, but I’m not a mind reader (nor do I want to be, where this is concerned). It appears that there is still a good bit of confusion.
OBTW, unless the tariffs get paused again, the de minimus for China jumps to a ludicrous $150 in June.
More info:
https://www.inc.com/jennifer-conrad/iits-official-the-duty-free-exemption-on-small-shipments-from-china-expires-may-2/91171380
https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/04/amendment-to-recipricol-tariffs-and-updated-duties-as-applied-to-low-value-imports-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china/
@rockblossom @werehatrack the $25 doesn’t make sense as there is a minimum tax rate on top of duty, however I doubt that the folks writing these alerts are always SME’s. Unless thr $25 was their fee on top of the government levied charges.
Also as I said, the brokerage community is besides themselves given all the changes, delays, etc that are being announced on what seems like a daily basis. Believe me when I say no one is clear on the legal path forward and everyone is trying to wade through all the changes.
I think we all need just wait for the dust to settle and see where everything ends up while understanding that any purchases made from the targeted countries may incurr duty, tax and potentially brokerage related charges. One needs to decide if that purchase is worth it, and it likely isnt.
And if you are interested, here is a really good article that delves into the three types of entries that can be filed and their requirements. It also talkes about the origins of de minimus
https://www.cato.org/blog/high-costs-eliminating-de-minimis-shipping
Yeah. What a clusterfuck. I would have to assume that this has been in the works for a while. Not sure when this actually launched, having only noticed it today, but this is not a program that would roll out overnight. I’m sure there’s a bunch of heads at the 'zon exploding right now.
@chienfou It launched a few weeks ago with a delayed imposition date of 5 April.
If you had stuff already on the way that hasn’t shown up, prepare to need lube.
@chienfou Yeah. I think the 'Zon Haul program was in the planning stage last year, thinking they could take advantage of the same small-dollar exemption used by Shein/Temu/et al - which is not there now. There will probably be people who will think: “But it’s Amazon, an American company! I can order for them without a tariff!”
@chienfou @rockblossom Sounds like Amazon is fully embracing the overseas junk-makers in their third-party sellers program, rather than maybe just tolerating it for the sake of making a buck.
@chienfou @ItalianScallion @rockblossom Amazon has a lot of Chinese sellers (who are not always obviously Chinese). They probably want to keep the business, but definitely want to pass on the tax to the buyer.
@chienfou @rockblossom @user98378149 I read a couple of articles from April 8th that said that in response to the uncertainty over tariffs, Amazon is restructuring their Haul program to focus on low-priced goods already in the US, usually well-known brands, rather than the no-name stuff they originally set out to promote and sell, and low-priced US-made goods.
@chienfou @ItalianScallion @rockblossom @user98378149 I suspect that present-in-the-US China-origin goods will get bumped in price dramatically as the tariff date approaches.
Or the administration could declare Great Victory and drop the whole thing again, further increasing the uncertainty levels.
Either way, this whole mess is idiotic.
@chienfou @ItalianScallion @rockblossom @user98378149 @werehatrack or before that. Companies are scrambling to both import and export goods between the US and CN right now. Air freight rates have increased from less than a dollar per kg to $7-$10/kg because of elasticity of demand. The airlines are laughing all the way to the bank and its the consumer who will suffer.
I was speaking with one of my forwarders the other day and they had customers chartering planes to avoid the higher duty rates. In case you are curious, the last time I looked at chartering a plane it was around $200k.
OBTW, about the synthetic opiod crisis that the tariffs are supposed to stop, ICE has been employing detection methods to catch incoming small-parcel fentanyl shipments all along, and that is not how most of it arrives in the US. The vast majority coming direct from China slips in via inclusion in tightly-sealed hidden packages concealed in large shipments of legit commercial goods, which these tariffs will do zip-zero-zilch to interdict.
And here’s a bit of advice that I hope none of you need: STAY THE FUCK AWAY FROM THAT SHIT. THEY CALL IT “THE ONE-DOSE ADDICTION” FOR GOOD REASON! Late last year, I was given fentanyl as part of the waking-anesthesia cocktail for an angiogram, and the emotional crash when it wore off was FUCKING INTENSELY BRUTAL. Anyone with an addiction-susceptible neurology or existing suicidal tendencies would have been ready to kill to get another dose. I recognized the withdrawal for what it was, and I vowed to NEVER allow that crap to be administered to me again.
@werehatrack It sounds like you made it out of that disturbing experience ok and I’m so glad to hear that. I find it hard to believe that fentanyl is used with humans knowing the high risk of addiction.
My bad experience was with oxycodone, i.e., Oxycontin, that was given to me for at least a couple of weeks after major surgery and damage to my body after a porch collapse accident. While taking it, I had terrifying recurring nightmares that more than ten years later I can still recall in every tiny detail. Oh, and hallucinations and mindbending so bad that I could not make sense out of an analog clock, and I thought there was a dog sleeping at the foot of my bed (there wasn’t). So, while I won’t use the same intensity as werehatrack against oxycodone, I would urge everyone who might end up taking oxycodone for a legitimate reason to talk to your doctor(s) about disturbing effects. The way it took me out of the world around me makes me understand how it could be psychologically addictive.
In other semi-related Amazon news
Ghods help a China shipper whose containers are on the water now with a US arrival slot of May 2nd or later. I’m expecting some importers to silently evaporate into the ether as the tariff date approaches, possibly even if they’ve paid up front for the goods.
This entire mess is sheer lunacy.
@tinamarie1974 WHOA!
Thank you meh community for your informed input in this topic. It pretty much bears out what I had puzzled out on my own. It’s nice to see people who know what they’re talking about addressing these issues.
BTW, I intentionally kept this topic apolitical.