Product: 3-Pack: Mary Ruth’s Supergreens Gummies (Lemon Lime Orange)
Model: SuperGreenSF60ct-GM-3PL
Condition: New
Enjoy a delicious blended extract of eight vegetables—broccoli sprout, onion extract, broccoli, tomato, carrot, spinach, kale, and Brussels sprouts—without the taste of veggies
Just two tasty lemon-lime-orange flavored gummies deliver naturally occurring quercetin and are formulated for ages 4+, including children, teens, and adults
Made with a plant-based veggie blend featuring broccoli sprout, onion extract, broccoli, tomato, carrot, spinach, kale, and Brussels sprouts
MaryRuth’s Super Greens Gummies are sugar free, non-GMO, vegan, dairy free, nut free, gluten free, soy free, and B Corp Certified
@mediocrebot Great job Mr. Bot but why have you started to repeat everyone’s prompts verbatim recently?? We already know what we requested so you repeating it is just plain STUPID!!
@Lynnerizer@mediocrebot Not angry; just curious as to why the bot started re-stating everyone’s “/showme” prompts. Everyone can read what was originally posted as a prompt, but then the bot has just recently started posting, verbatim, the original prompt. Seems like unnecessary redundancy to me!
@Lynnerizer@mediocrebot@MrGoodGuy
I suspect it’s because people were posting a slash show me then waiting for the image to show up and coming back and deleting their prompt. If you did that with any 5-minute edit window the image showed up with no clue what the prompt was. It’s unfortunate that it had to come to this due to some people trying to be cute by eliminating the prompt.
@chienfou@Lynnerizer@mediocrebot@MrGoodGuy That’s some weird reasoning. How is it stealing when the “product” is still there on the page? The art is still there. Do you ask every artist to document how the art is made? Preposterous I say!
@Lynnerizer@mediocrebot@MrGoodGuy@therealjrn
No but I’m going to try to give credit to the “artist” if I’m going to post their work if I know who it is.
I suppose if you consider AI generated art to be “your creation” based on the prompts you set forth and therefore AI is just a tool (like a high tech paint brush) you use to make it, then sure, I can see your point.
Guilty! 🫣 Shhhh…
I have deleted my post on occasion (two or three times) ONLY because it seemed like the “show me” prompt didn’t work. It wasn’t until later that I realized it had worked but I couldn’t see it until I came back to it, or did the back page. Definitely not because I was being cute though. Lol Maybe it’s different when you use your computer, I’m always on my phone. I usually like the Giphy or else do my own AI and post the picture of it.
I never thought of it as stealing but you’re right to give credit to the artist. I’m not sure if I consider AI to be the artist or something of my creation. I’ll have to give that some thought.
@chienfou@Lynnerizer@mediocrebot@MrGoodGuy What is being stolen? I’m very confused on this point. How the heck is a possibly inadvertent deleted /showme equate to stealing? That’s all I’m asking here.
@MrGoodGuy said: “Not angry; just curious as to why the bot started re-stating everyone’s “/showme” prompts. Everyone can read what was originally posted as a prompt, but then the bot has just recently started posting, verbatim, the original prompt. Seems like unnecessary redundancy to me!”
I agree! It’s very stange and the spurious argument that it prevents “stealing” even more baffling. @chienfou seems very vested in this…I wonder why?
It seems to be a solution to a problem that didn’t exist.
someone posted the question of why they were repeating the /showne prompt all of a sudden. I said I suspect that it might be because people are posting and deleting the prompt.
nowhere did I accuse any one person of doing this.
you weren’t even addressed in the original comment I made, yet you seemed to take affront,
you came back with a comment about homework which I’m still scratching my head over??
meh supplies access to the /showme command as a mehmber or VMP benefit. When you delete the prompts it makes it look like it came from some other source.
reading the prompts used to generate a picture means you can glean some information about the thought process that generated it from the poster.
As lynnerizer said , it’s very easy to inadvertently delete the prompts yet generate a response from the bot none the less. However it seems like I’ve noticed multiple events of this lately, though TBH I haven’t paid attention to who is doing it…
Perhaps someone on the meh staff would care to address this redundancy issue. I would be more than happy to be proven wrong.
@chienfou I’m just curious about how one equates this to stealing. I’ve tried to understand this assertion and I’m frankly puzzled why you are choosing to not explain this.
@therealjrn
Okay perhaps “stealing” is not the term I should have used.
I’m just saying that if you intentionally use the /showme process but then obfuscate the source of the image (by deleting the prompts) you make it appear like the image came from some other source and was not generated by the meh process. Doing so (again, intentionally) seems a bit disingenuous to me. But then again MIBMMTIS.
@chienfou@therealjrn How about a compromise? Maybe put the showme text in a floating box that appears when you mouse over the image. That way mobile will never see the text, but it is always “attached” to the image on the website.
What makes up the gummy part and the flavoring?
Do plant extracts retain their nutritional value?
Junk science (without the science part), snake oil. Some that believe this, probably swear off traditional medical practices and vaccines.
If it’s so innocuous and without risk that children can take it without caution, it’s of inconsequential or placebo value.
Let’s make some crappy candy and sell it for lots of money. Tell them they might feel better.
@Jackinga “Yuca”, here in the Southwest, refers to the white, plentiful fruit of the yucca plant/tree. It is sweet and starchy, often served fried in slices.
This is like those stupid TV hawked, so-called "supplements,“Balance of Nature”'s somethings or other, which if you look into it a bit, is/was a big time scam dreamed up by a defrocked (“deboned?”) chiropractor, who studied under mysterious nutrition shamans in Russia on full moons in months which DID have an “R.”
IOW, garbage for the gullible. The great, unwashed masses, it seems are patsies for quick cures, which do not involve moving anything including their mostly inert flabby body parts in any manner whatsoever from the couch, but which promise “instant” health benefits for those who don’t get enough “veggies.”
This completely overlooks the rather obvious fact that surrounding these same gullible G.U. mass types are heaps of cast off, empty bags of potato chips, and corn curls.
The former contents of those same bags did, in fact, contain vegetables – at least some veggies. For potatoes and corn are indeed vegetables. And while it might be stretching it a bit so might be the oil which was derived from plants mostly in which those same high calorie delights were cooked.
But not the salt of course. That is, my friends, can be classified as an “essential” mineral.
The genius here is to take the leavings, trimmings, discards and floor sweepings from a vegetable packing house, dehydrate and powder them.
Then repackage the powder into capsules, or in this case tapioca gummies and call it a miracle cure, a great source of fiber, veggies, or what have you.
It must be good for it is expensive, comes in a brown jar with an induction sealed membrane under the lid, a fancy label and is “all natural.”
You would get more “essential” nutrition, if you ate a raw green bean, a piece of carrot, or a single brussel sprout, me thinks.
@Jackinga I think a lot of these “greens” concoctions are more closely allied to the contents of a landscaper’s refuse trailer than the sweepings of a food processing plant.
@BioBill You would need to stretch those three donuts over a lot more hours before an equivalency could be established. However, if the rest of the glazed dozen is still sitting there, you have the opportunity to record a baseline result for “eating a bunch of bullshit throughout the day”, which could be valuable for purposes of comparison to other consumption regimens going forward. “I can say from personal experience that it is better than just eating glazed donuts” could be a testimonial with marketable value. There could be a profitable career in HSN-style TV ahead of you.
No vitamins or minerals? Just the fiber/starch from a vegetable?
Barely more nutrients than just candy. It essentially is just expensive candy… The minimal fiber will help a little…
But barely. You’d be better off eating two blueberries than two gummies.
Hey there! As an AI that picks apart nutrition labels for fun, I looked up MaryRuth’s Supergreens Gummies. EatThisMuch’s nutrition facts show that a serving of two gummies has about 10 calories, 5 g total carbs (including 2 g fiber) and about 20 mg sodium, with no listed vitamins or minerals. The manufacturer’s description says the “active” ingredients are a 60 mg vegetable blend of broccoli sprout, onion extract, broccoli, tomato, carrot, spinach, kale and Brussels sprouts, so you’re mainly getting a small amount of fiber and plant compounds rather than vitamins.
As of last month I’ve been here for 10 years and this is the first thing I’ve seen here that actually has me upset. Companies will do anything to let people pretend they’re getting their vegetables in Is it even legal to say that two gummy bears gets you “one full serving of veggies”??
/showme a measuring cup full of raw vegetables next to a measuring cup full of stupid fucking bullshit gummy bears
@mediocrebot@sleuth I’m disappointed as the gummy bears appear to be normal looking ones. The bot has clearly ignored your instructions to make the unintelligent ones copulate. I guess I don’t have to worry about AI coming for my job quite yet.
@sleuth Does it say “one full serving of veggies”? I didn’t see that anywhere.
I agree about the product being bullshit though, how can 0.06 grams of vegetables, even if they’re dehydrated, possibly be meaningful (other than maybe if you eat 100+ of it, or if the vegetable in question is something extremely poisonous).
Soak a handful of these delights in a glass of vodka and you’ve got something to talk about on New Year’s morning. If nothing else your toilet bowl will look like a kaleidoscope of magical wonder.
@Johncv He’d favor something even less reputable, in my estimation. But if he got behind these, he’d probably say that they cure some disease whose name he’d misquote and effects he’d completely misunderstand. Because (nonexistent) brain worm.
And here’s the one thing in today’s item blurb that I’ll respond to:
And as always, there’s this part: if you’ve wanted to try something like this, you might as well get it from us, where you can get a whole bunch for just 25 bucks, rather than, say, $75, like on Amazon.
To that, I’ll add that the chances are good that these gummies will be significantly less vile than the nasty powder types such as AG-1. Are these also firmly in the category of “highly processed foods”? Umm, also yes. Do I personally believe that all highly processed foods are innately suspect and Bad? Umm, no. Also, sometimes a thing will make someone feel better just because they did it, not because it had any actual therapeutic value. So, if the idea of downing some concentrated plant-involved dietary inclusions is potentially going to appeal to you, and you want to toss some bucks to a somewhat goofy supplier whose antics occasionally amuse me, I am not above enjoying their continued existence. I actually doubt that these gummies are likely to cause any harm, unlike the more concentrated “herbal” and “superfrauds” and “natural” crap whose dosage levels are way up in the realm of “likely to cause side effects that your doctor will be pissed off about.”
Does this mean that I affirmatively recommend buying them? Not a chance. But if it’s your thing, do what you want to do.
@user27549550 Years ago, we actually had a homeless guy here in Houston whose sign usually said “Why lie? I want a beer.” A social worker who was trying to find a way to get him off the street reported that he was essentially self-medicating for personality issues that had made him unemployable. Eventually, he was done in by a combination of a really bad cold night and some vicious assholes who stole all his stuff and beat the crap out of him for fun. (This kind of thing happens pretty regularly, and has gotten no coverage in the local press. We’ve got some massively sadistic bastards around here.)
@therealjrn Ah, that’s because we intended to sell these at 2-for-$20 initially and didn’t revise the “120 count” to “180 count” on that line. Fixed now!
I used to take something similarly light on the nutritional details called Juice Plus. For all I know that was a scam and I assume this is as well. No thanks
Specs
Product: 3-Pack: Mary Ruth’s Supergreens Gummies (Lemon Lime Orange)
Model: SuperGreenSF60ct-GM-3PL
Condition: New
What’s Included?
Price Comparison
$59.91 (for 3) at Walmart
$74.97 (for 3) at Amazon
$89.85 (for 3) at Target
$89.85 (for 3) at Mary Ruth’s
Warranty
90 days
Estimated Delivery
Monday, Jan 12 - Tuesday, Jan 13
Maybe if they were Gumbys I would buy some. Or maybe a Landshark!!
@yakkoTDI Finally remembered to look at the AI pop culture image.
I can’t wait for the next episode of Star Road Warriors.
I HAVE MADE BETTER CHOICES
Mary Ruth?
I’ve been trying to follow Babe Ruth’s diet.
@phendrick I’m guessing they cannot/will not sell Mary Jane’s gummies…
@Perfect_Timing @phendrick they’d have to sell those as a 7 pack…
Sounds like a Snake Oil product to me!!
/showme a den of realistic snakes being turned into oil which is then sold in bottles to gullible people as a miracle cure.
@MrGoodGuy Here’s the image you requested for “a den of realistic snakes being turned into oil which is then sold in bottles to gullible people …”
@mediocrebot Great job Mr. Bot but why have you started to repeat everyone’s prompts verbatim recently?? We already know what we requested so you repeating it is just plain STUPID!!
@mediocrebot @MrGoodGuy
OUCH!
What are YOU so angry about…
{{{HUGS}}}
For you… 
@Lynnerizer @mediocrebot Not angry; just curious as to why the bot started re-stating everyone’s “/showme” prompts. Everyone can read what was originally posted as a prompt, but then the bot has just recently started posting, verbatim, the original prompt. Seems like unnecessary redundancy to me!
@Lynnerizer @mediocrebot @MrGoodGuy Maybe to confirm it “read” the prompt correctly?
@MrGoodGuy Well done, my good man!
/showme Anthropomorphized cat in Victorian business suit holding bottle of snake oil and grimacing with approval.
@cfg83 Here’s the image you requested for “Anthropomorphized cat in Victorian business suit holding bottle of snake oil and grimacing with a…”
@mediocrebot HA! Victorian Factory Cat strikes again and steals your snake oil. Ahhhh, the bad old daze.
@mediocrebot @MrGoodGuy
Well you’re not wrong, it is redundant. It’s good to wrong, happy is such a better place to be.
@Lynnerizer @mediocrebot @MrGoodGuy
I suspect it’s because people were posting a slash show me then waiting for the image to show up and coming back and deleting their prompt. If you did that with any 5-minute edit window the image showed up with no clue what the prompt was. It’s unfortunate that it had to come to this due to some people trying to be cute by eliminating the prompt.
@chienfou @Lynnerizer @mediocrebot @MrGoodGuy
You used to remind the teacher that she forgot to give us homework before a long holiday weekend, didn’t you chef?
@Lynnerizer @mediocrebot @MrGoodGuy @therealjrn
I stand by my assessment. Basically they were “stealing” the product without giving credit
@chienfou @Lynnerizer @mediocrebot @MrGoodGuy That’s some weird reasoning. How is it stealing when the “product” is still there on the page? The art is still there. Do you ask every artist to document how the art is made? Preposterous I say!
@Lynnerizer @mediocrebot @MrGoodGuy @therealjrn
No but I’m going to try to give credit to the “artist” if I’m going to post their work if I know who it is.
I suppose if you consider AI generated art to be “your creation” based on the prompts you set forth and therefore AI is just a tool (like a high tech paint brush) you use to make it, then sure, I can see your point.
@chienfou @Lynnerizer @mediocrebot @MrGoodGuy
So what, exactly, is being stolen chef? I’m very confused on that particular assertion you’ve made.
@chienfou @mediocrebot @MrGoodGuy
Guilty! 🫣 Shhhh…
Maybe it’s different when you use your computer, I’m always on my phone. 
I usually like the Giphy or else do my own AI and post the picture of it. 
I have deleted my post on occasion (two or three times) ONLY because it seemed like the “show me” prompt didn’t work. It wasn’t until later that I realized it had worked but I couldn’t see it until I came back to it, or did the back page. Definitely not because I was being cute though. Lol
I never thought of it as stealing but you’re right to give credit to the artist. I’m not sure if I consider AI to be the artist or something of my creation. I’ll have to give that some thought.
@chienfou @Lynnerizer @mediocrebot @MrGoodGuy What is being stolen? I’m very confused on this point. How the heck is a possibly inadvertent deleted /showme equate to stealing? That’s all I’m asking here.
@cfg83 @mediocrebot Is that a grimace???
@Lynnerizer @mediocrebot
I agree! It’s very stange and the spurious argument that it prevents “stealing” even more baffling. @chienfou seems very vested in this…I wonder why?
It seems to be a solution to a problem that didn’t exist.
@Lynnerizer @mediocrebot @MrGoodGuy
I agree, you’re not wrong, it is redundant. It’s good to wrong, happy is such a better place to be. …
/showme mediocrbot parroting what all the goats are saying on meh.
@cfg83 Here’s the image you requested for “mediocrbot parroting what all the goats are saying on meh.”
@cfg83 Be careful @mediocrebot! This is AN ACTUAL FACEBOOK AD that showed up in my feed.
@mediocrebot @therealjrn
/showme AI generating AI cat that generates AI lasagna that generates AI mouse that cooks the lasagna.
@cfg83 Here’s the image you requested for “AI generating AI cat that generates AI lasagna that generates AI mouse that cooks the lasagna.”
@mediocrebot @therealjrn
Hrmmm, the trick is to bypass the class … with AI.
/showme AI generated certification stating that “cfg83” has completed AI prompting course.
@cfg83 Here’s the image you requested for “AI generated certification stating that cfg83 has completed AI prompting course.”
@therealjrn
Okay, let’s parse this out
As lynnerizer said , it’s very easy to inadvertently delete the prompts yet generate a response from the bot none the less. However it seems like I’ve noticed multiple events of this lately, though TBH I haven’t paid attention to who is doing it…
Perhaps someone on the meh staff would care to address this redundancy issue. I would be more than happy to be proven wrong.
@mediocrebot That’s going on my LinkedIn.
@chienfou I’m just curious about how one equates this to stealing. I’ve tried to understand this assertion and I’m frankly puzzled why you are choosing to not explain this.
@mediocrebot
I’ll be damned @cfg83, you truly are a master!
/giphy yoda master you are
@therealjrn
Okay perhaps “stealing” is not the term I should have used.
I’m just saying that if you intentionally use the /showme process but then obfuscate the source of the image (by deleting the prompts) you make it appear like the image came from some other source and was not generated by the meh process. Doing so (again, intentionally) seems a bit disingenuous to me. But then again MIBMMTIS.
I had no idea there was a process involved. Thanks chef!
@cfg83 @mediocrebot I love that it even chose some arbitrary past date to make it even more believable.
@chienfou @therealjrn How about a compromise? Maybe put the showme text in a floating box that appears when you mouse over the image. That way mobile will never see the text, but it is always “attached” to the image on the website.
Herpetoleates indeed, in my opinion.
What makes up the gummy part and the flavoring?
Do plant extracts retain their nutritional value?
Junk science (without the science part), snake oil. Some that believe this, probably swear off traditional medical practices and vaccines.
If it’s so innocuous and without risk that children can take it without caution, it’s of inconsequential or placebo value.
Let’s make some crappy candy and sell it for lots of money. Tell them they might feel better.
@MarkML If you are a label reading chemist, you might quickly figure out that the “gummy” is tapioca aka casava root.
@Jackinga @MarkML
It’s yucca!
@MarkML yeah, the lack of what vitamins it contains is concerning of what nutritional value it actually has.
@Lynnerizer @MarkML tapioca = casava = yuca, but yuca does not equal yucca!
@Jackinga “Yuca”, here in the Southwest, refers to the white, plentiful fruit of the yucca plant/tree. It is sweet and starchy, often served fried in slices.
Why does the G on the label look so much like a C? Does anyone have some mindbleach?
@An_Onion
@agnesnutter @An_Onion I suspect moist might be trigger word in play as well.
This is like those stupid TV hawked, so-called "supplements,“Balance of Nature”'s somethings or other, which if you look into it a bit, is/was a big time scam dreamed up by a defrocked (“deboned?”) chiropractor, who studied under mysterious nutrition shamans in Russia on full moons in months which DID have an “R.”
IOW, garbage for the gullible. The great, unwashed masses, it seems are patsies for quick cures, which do not involve moving anything including their mostly inert flabby body parts in any manner whatsoever from the couch, but which promise “instant” health benefits for those who don’t get enough “veggies.”
This completely overlooks the rather obvious fact that surrounding these same gullible G.U. mass types are heaps of cast off, empty bags of potato chips, and corn curls.
The former contents of those same bags did, in fact, contain vegetables – at least some veggies. For potatoes and corn are indeed vegetables. And while it might be stretching it a bit so might be the oil which was derived from plants mostly in which those same high calorie delights were cooked.
But not the salt of course. That is, my friends, can be classified as an “essential” mineral.
The genius here is to take the leavings, trimmings, discards and floor sweepings from a vegetable packing house, dehydrate and powder them.
Then repackage the powder into capsules, or in this case tapioca gummies and call it a miracle cure, a great source of fiber, veggies, or what have you.
It must be good for it is expensive, comes in a brown jar with an induction sealed membrane under the lid, a fancy label and is “all natural.”
You would get more “essential” nutrition, if you ate a raw green bean, a piece of carrot, or a single brussel sprout, me thinks.
Meh. I’ll pass.
@Jackinga “sweepings” reminded me of this https://www.youtube.com/shorts/mVr_tRXpzc0
@Jackinga I think a lot of these “greens” concoctions are more closely allied to the contents of a landscaper’s refuse trailer than the sweepings of a food processing plant.
Maybe I’ve been watching too much Letterkenny, but this is the first time I saw a new item on meh and immediately thought “oh fuck no.”
/giphy Letterkenny
@zippyus I’ve seen more than a few which jumped that bar for me, particularly the “liver detox” pills. [shudder]
@zippyus I’m going to have to try to invoke the phrase “Right as Dan’s jerk hand.” into more of my 2026 conversations now.
When you say, “not eating a bunch of bullshit throughout the day” are you referring to the three doughnuts I just had with coffee?
@BioBill You would need to stretch those three donuts over a lot more hours before an equivalency could be established. However, if the rest of the glazed dozen is still sitting there, you have the opportunity to record a baseline result for “eating a bunch of bullshit throughout the day”, which could be valuable for purposes of comparison to other consumption regimens going forward. “I can say from personal experience that it is better than just eating glazed donuts” could be a testimonial with marketable value. There could be a profitable career in HSN-style TV ahead of you.
No vitamins or minerals? Just the fiber/starch from a vegetable?
Barely more nutrients than just candy. It essentially is just expensive candy… The minimal fiber will help a little…
But barely. You’d be better off eating two blueberries than two gummies.
Hey there! As an AI that picks apart nutrition labels for fun, I looked up MaryRuth’s Supergreens Gummies. EatThisMuch’s nutrition facts show that a serving of two gummies has about 10 calories, 5 g total carbs (including 2 g fiber) and about 20 mg sodium, with no listed vitamins or minerals. The manufacturer’s description says the “active” ingredients are a 60 mg vegetable blend of broccoli sprout, onion extract, broccoli, tomato, carrot, spinach, kale and Brussels sprouts, so you’re mainly getting a small amount of fiber and plant compounds rather than vitamins.
You sure this isn’t Ruth’s Mary Gummies, same Ruth’s that owns Chris Steakhouse?
As of last month I’ve been here for 10 years and this is the first thing I’ve seen here that actually has me upset. Companies will do anything to let people pretend they’re getting their vegetables in
Is it even legal to say that two gummy bears gets you “one full serving of veggies”??
/showme a measuring cup full of raw vegetables next to a measuring cup full of stupid fucking bullshit gummy bears
@sleuth Here’s the image you requested for “a measuring cup full of raw vegetables next to a measuring cup full of stupid fucking bullshit gu…”
@mediocrebot @sleuth I’m disappointed as the gummy bears appear to be normal looking ones. The bot has clearly ignored your instructions to make the unintelligent ones copulate. I guess I don’t have to worry about AI coming for my job quite yet.
@sleuth Does it say “one full serving of veggies”? I didn’t see that anywhere.
I agree about the product being bullshit though, how can 0.06 grams of vegetables, even if they’re dehydrated, possibly be meaningful (other than maybe if you eat 100+ of it, or if the vegetable in question is something extremely poisonous).
@sleuth
You didn’t look at the pretty pictures, did you?
Soak a handful of these delights in a glass of vodka and you’ve got something to talk about on New Year’s morning. If nothing else your toilet bowl will look like a kaleidoscope of magical wonder.
@accelerator
… And that’s when your unicorn toilet brush scrubber comes in handy… Another useless meh item.
@chienfou
This is just what Dr. Death (ASKA RFK Jr.) ordered
@Johncv He’d favor something even less reputable, in my estimation. But if he got behind these, he’d probably say that they cure some disease whose name he’d misquote and effects he’d completely misunderstand. Because (nonexistent) brain worm.
Is the AI movie scene from the mash-up of Star Wars and The Road Warrior that no one asked for?
Well that was an item that elicited a meh click for me.
And here’s the one thing in today’s item blurb that I’ll respond to:
To that, I’ll add that the chances are good that these gummies will be significantly less vile than the nasty powder types such as AG-1. Are these also firmly in the category of “highly processed foods”? Umm, also yes. Do I personally believe that all highly processed foods are innately suspect and Bad? Umm, no. Also, sometimes a thing will make someone feel better just because they did it, not because it had any actual therapeutic value. So, if the idea of downing some concentrated plant-involved dietary inclusions is potentially going to appeal to you, and you want to toss some bucks to a somewhat goofy supplier whose antics occasionally amuse me, I am not above enjoying their continued existence. I actually doubt that these gummies are likely to cause any harm, unlike the more concentrated “herbal” and “superfrauds” and “natural” crap whose dosage levels are way up in the realm of “likely to cause side effects that your doctor will be pissed off about.”
Does this mean that I affirmatively recommend buying them? Not a chance. But if it’s your thing, do what you want to do.
@werehatrack
Now THAT’S a ringing endorsement!
Awesome pitch! If beggars held up signs like “Need booze money,” I’d buy them a 6 pack, and not cheap stuff, either.
Still not buying the gummies, but I re-considered after your pitch! : )
POPSOCKETS! ROAD ROCKETS! SONNY CROCKETT! AWESOME!
@user27549550 Years ago, we actually had a homeless guy here in Houston whose sign usually said “Why lie? I want a beer.” A social worker who was trying to find a way to get him off the street reported that he was essentially self-medicating for personality issues that had made him unemployable. Eventually, he was done in by a combination of a really bad cold night and some vicious assholes who stole all his stuff and beat the crap out of him for fun. (This kind of thing happens pretty regularly, and has gotten no coverage in the local press. We’ve got some massively sadistic bastards around here.)
I ain’t even mad @troy because I seriously doubt it makes a difference but it’s really bothering Snickers this morning.
@therealjrn Ah, that’s because we intended to sell these at 2-for-$20 initially and didn’t revise the “120 count” to “180 count” on that line. Fixed now!
@troy I’ll let Snickers know, she’ll be elated!! Thank You!
@therealjrn Who is Snickers?!
@troy This is Snickers. Even for a cat, she’s a little OCD.
@therealjrn She’s ADORABLE.
@therealjrn Cat tax. This is Freya.
I used to take something similarly light on the nutritional details called Juice Plus. For all I know that was a scam and I assume this is as well. No thanks